Austin v. Alabama Check Cashers Ass'n
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
These consolidated appeals arise out of the State Banking Department's regulation of deferred-presentment transactions, more commonly referred to as "payday loans" because the maturity date of these short-term "loans" generally coincides with the borrower's next payday. The questions presented are whether the Alabama Small Loan Act, § 5-18-1 et seq., Ala. Code 1975, applies to deferred-presentment transactions and whether the trial court erred in holding that…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited52 opinions
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County JailSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Local Number 93, International Ass'n of Firefighters v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- McKenzie Check Advance of Florida v. BettsSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
- K.E.W. v. T.W.E.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
- Martin v. Cash Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2010
- Championcomm.net of Tuscaloosa, Inc. v. MortonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
- Gatlin v. JoinerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.