Legal Opinion
Henry v. Cash Today, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided September 19, 2000No. CIV. A. H-99-3335, CIV. A. C-99-305PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HARMON, District Judge.
Pending before the Court in the above referenced consolidated action, alleging Defendants’ usurious “payday loans” transacted under pretext as sales of advertising, violate the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1601 et seq., as interpreted by the Federal Reserve Board in implementing Regulation Z, 12 C.R.R. § 226, the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”) and seeking damages, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961 et seq., and Texas state law, including the usury laws, Texas Finance Code Ch. 342 and/or Texas Credit Code Ch. 3A, Tex. Rev.Civ. State. Ann.…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc. v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. RoperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Parker v. Time Warner Entertainment Co., L.P.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- In Re Enron Corp. SecuritiesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2006
- Lehocky v. Tidel Technologies, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2004
- Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corp. v. Dynegy, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2005
- Stoffels v. SBC Communications, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.