Legal Opinion
Curd v. Travelers Insurance
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided May 24, 1935No. 24301, 24302, 24303PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.
Mose Curd brought three suits against Travelers Insurance Company, alleging, in brief, that he was an employee of the Peerless Woolen Mills; that the defendant company issued to the Peerless Woolen Mills a group-insurance contract in which the Peerless Woolen Mills was named as the assured; that the Peerless Woolen Mills paid for the insurance and gave it to its employees; that the master policy was designated as G-728; that the insurance provided for a death benefit and a disability benefit; that under this group contract of insurance plaintiff had three certificates issued to him, they…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Davis v. Metropolitan InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
- Magee v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
- Austin v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
- Baker v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Travelers Insurance v. ConineCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
3Cited by13 opinions
- Dawes Mining Co. v. CallahanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Lancaster v. Travelers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Cutledge v. Ætna Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Nick v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
- Blaylock v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.