King v. Steel Builders, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, P. J.
1. The petition as amended and the plea and answer and cross-action of the defendant contain many items and involve much evidence. As shown hereinbefore, the auditor had a conference with the attorney for the plaintiff and attorney Holleman, the original attorney representing the defendant. The purpose of the conference of the auditor with the attorneys was to read and discuss a report. The evidence was stenographically reported. Counsel for both parties agreed that the auditor’s report was satisfactory, and that no further finding of law or fact was necessary and the form of the report was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Greer v. AndrewSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Clements v. FletcherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Candler v. BryanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Southern Pine Co. v. DickeySupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
- Snelling v. DarrellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1855
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bay Point Condominium Ass'n v. RML Corp.Norfolk County Circuit Court · 2000
- McCaughey v. MurphySupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
- Bay Point Condominium Ass'n v. RML Corp.Norfolk County Circuit Court · 2001