Legal Opinion
Taylor v. National Group of Companies, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided December 8, 1989No. 3:89CV7009PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOHN W. POTTER, District Judge:
This matter is before the Court on the motion for summary judgment of all defendants, plaintiffs’ opposition and defendants’ reply. Counts III and VI of the complaint were previously dismissed voluntarily by plaintiffs. Also before the Court is plaintiffs’ request for a jury trial.
Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, summary judgment is proper only where there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). The Supreme Court has recently stated that the inquiry…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dorricott v. Fairhill Center for AgingDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1998
- Taylor v. National Group of Companies, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1990
- Massi v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield Mutual of OhioDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1991
- Billiejean Gebers v. Commercial Data Center Inc., Don KlanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Joe L. James Mae James v. City of Livonia, a Municipal Corporation Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993