Legal Opinion
Dorricott v. Fairhill Center for Aging
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided April 21, 1998No. 1:97-cv-01373PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GWIN, District Judge.
On February 23, 1998, Defendants Fairhill Center for Aging, et al. (“Fairhill”) filed a motion for summary judgement against Plaintiff Denise A Dorricott [Doc. 24]. In their motion, Defendants seek judgment on all claims in the complaint [Doc. I]. 1 Plaintiff Dorricott sues Defendants Fairhill, her former employer, for sexual harassment and retaliatory discharge from her job. For the reasons that follow, defendants’ motion for summary judgment is granted in part, and denied in part.
I. Facts
From June 5, 1996 to November 26, 1996, Plaintiff Denise Dorricott…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Barbara J. HENSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF DUNDEE, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Wiles v. Medina Auto PartsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Wiles v. Medina Auto PartsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Deboer Structures (U.S.A.) Inc. v. Shaffer Tent & Awning Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2002
- Cavin v. Honda of America Manufacturing, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2001
- Arthur v. Armco, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2000
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.