Legal Opinion
Leavenworth v. Mathes
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 18, 1995No. 13635PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.
The plaintiffs appeal from the judgment of the trial court granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The plaintiffs brought this action against the defendant for legal malpractice. The action was originally filed on August 20,1991. Thereafter, the plaintiffs filed an amended two count complaint, alleging negligence and breach of contract by the defendant.
The plaintiffs are two of the three beneficiaries under the will of their deceased mother, Maude Leavenworth (testatrix). In 1988, the testatrix hired the defendant to prepare a will…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Shore v. Town of StoningtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Ogle v. FuitenIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
- Petriello v. KalmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ciarlelli v. RomeoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Davies v. General Tours, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Leak-Gilbert v. FahleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Rangel v. ParkhurstConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Ankerman v. MancusoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.