Legal Opinion

Keith v. Fink

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1868PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Montgomery county; the Hon. E. T. Hice, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Breese

Appellee, being a creditor by note of Keith, Lyford & Company, composed of John M. Keith, F. M. Lyford and Charles M. Wool, on the first day of February, 1867, sued out of the office of the clerk of the Montgomery circuit court, a writ of attachment under the act of 1865, amending the general attachment law, on an affidavit then filed by him, that Keith & Lyford, partners, under the name of Keith, Lyford & Co., had fraudulently conveyed and assigned their property and effects so as to hinder and delay their creditors, and that, within two years prior to filing the affidavit. The writ was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wilson v. . RobertsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1860

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pritchett v. Pollock & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  2. Johnston v. Standard Shoe Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1893
  3. Atlas National Bank of Chicago v. MoreAppellate Court of Illinois · 1891
  4. Bergman v. JonesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Ryhiner v. RueggerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1886

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API