Legal Opinion

Atlas National Bank of Chicago v. More

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 13, 1891PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Cook County; the Hon, Kichard Prerdergast, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtGary, J.

On the 25th day of September, 1888, the Wilson & Bayliss Company was incorporated as the successor of George Wilson, Jr., and Thomas P. Bayliss, in the furniture trade. The corporation took the merchandise, fixtures, lease and good-will of the firm of Wilson & Bayliss in payment for a large part of its stock, but the debts due from and to the old firm remained theirs.

They then oived the bank about $10,000, for which the bank held as collateral, among other things, a tin box containing leases and chattel mortgages taken by the firm for furniture sold to customers. The firm had free access to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Field v. RidgelyIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Martin v. JuddIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  3. P. C. Hanford Oil Co. v. First National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Ide v. SayerIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  5. McKinney, Gilmore & Co. v. Farmers' National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1882

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. American Trust & Savings Bank v. GradleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895
  2. Jones v. SpencerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1898
  3. Thirty-First Street Building & Loan Ass'n v. WetherellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API