Legal Opinion

Pritchett v. Pollock & Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 15, 1886PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Appeal from tbe Circuit Court of Wilcox. Tried before tbe Hon. John Moore. This was a statutory trial of the right of property in and to a stock of goods, between J..Pollock & Co., plaintiffs in attachment against McOaskey & Ratcliff, and D. S. Pritchett as claimant.

Read the full summary

Appeal from tbe Circuit Court of Wilcox. Tried before tbe Hon. John Moore. This was a statutory trial of the right of property in and to a stock of goods, between J..Pollock & Co., plaintiffs in attachment against McOaskey & Ratcliff, and D. S. Pritchett as claimant. The stock of goods had belonged to said Mc-Caskey & Eatcliff, and the plaintiffs’ attachment was levied on them on the Dth January, 1886. The claimant derived title under a purchase by him from said McCaskey & Eatcliff, as evidenced by a bill of sale dated January 7th, 1886, which recited as its consideration the payment of…

1Opinion of the CourtStone, C. J.

— There .does not appear to be any controversy as to the facts of this case. The witnesses are substantially agreed as to every material question. J. Pollock & Co. were attaching creditors of McCaskey & Eatcliff, who had been partners in merchandise. The amount'and bona fides of their claim are not disputed. It ante-dated the conveyance to Pritchett, after noticed. Pritchett interposed a claim to the property attached, and a trial at law ensued, called in our jurisprudence a “trial of the right of property.” There were verdict and judgment for the plaintiffs in attachment, and Pritchett, the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Crawford v. KirkseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  2. Hodges Bros. v. Coleman & CarrollSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  3. Wilson v. . RobertsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  4. Lukins v. AirdSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  5. Lehman, Durr & Co. v. Kelly & Bro.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1880

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Bienville Water Supply Co. v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  2. Manchuria S. S. Co. v. Harry G. G. Donald & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Pollak v. SearcySupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  4. Groetter, Weil & Co. v. Norman Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  5. Glass v. Meyer, Son & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1899

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API