Legal Opinion

Johnston v. Standard Shoe Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 29, 1893No. 89PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIGHTFOOT, Chief Justice.

On January 31, 1889, the mercantile firm of Hunstable & Moore executed to appellant, John T. Johnston, their clerk, as trustee, a chattel mortgage upon their stock of merchandise and fixtures, to secure certain debts therein named; among others, a debt for $3700 to the Blake Mutual Building and Loan Association. The deed of trust was duly filed for registration, and the trustee took ostensible possession of the property, and while in such possession it was levied upon by the sheriff of Dallas County, under a writ of attachment sued out in the case of the Standard Shoe…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Weaver v. AshcroftTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Vance v. UpsonTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  3. P. J. Willis & Bro. v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Stansell v. FlemingTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Converse & Co. v. McKeeTexas Supreme Court · 1855

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. Western Nat. Bank of HerefordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  2. Sherk v. First Nat. Bank of HerefordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  3. Hawkins v. Western Nat. Bank of HerefordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  4. In Re Huber Contracting, Ltd.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 2006
  5. Sherk v. First Nat. Bank of HerefordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API