Legal Opinion
Coker v. Watson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 5, 1926No. 17025PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
LOGSDON, O.
There are five assignments of error in the petition in error, but in the presentation of the case in the briefs plaintiff comprises all assignments of error under two propositions, thus stated:-
“First, that judgments on the pleadings are never favored and are also reversible judgmeilts when there are facts disputed in the pleadings and when there is on file a reply which denies the affirmative new matter set up in the answer.
“Second, that the Secretary of the Interior did not approve the deed made by Wisey Coker to J. M. Watson; that he had no authority to approve such…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Mires v. HoganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Maas v. DunmyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Conwill v. EldridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Peck v. First Nat. Bank of ClaremoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Baker v. HammettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hooks v. Berry-Hart Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Western Hospital Ass'n v. Industrial Accident BoardIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
- Claypool v. Employers' Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Billy v. BurnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Thomas v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930