Legal Opinion

Claypool v. Employers' Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 2, 1936No. 26535PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This suit was filed by plaintiff in error, as plaintiff, against the defendant in error Employers’ Casualty Company, a corporation, W. B. Todd, and Howard H. Thomas. A motion on the part of W. B. Todd to quash the service upon him was by the court sustained. No appeal was taken from that action of the court. The record before the court does not show service upon the defendant Howard H. Thomas, nor any judgment by the court for or against him. The parties in this court are therefore the plaintiff in error, J. L. Claypool, and the defendant in error Employers’ Casualty Company.

The plaintiff in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mires v. HoganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Coker v. WatsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of VanetMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Ex Parte StephensonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1949
  3. Severson v. Roberts, County Treas.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  4. Garland v. GarlandCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  5. Little v. Employer's Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API