Legal Opinion

Naftzger v. Buser

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 10, 1920No. 22,413PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Sedgwick district court, division No. 2; Thornton W. Sargent, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The action was one to recover the sum of money stated in a written instrument containing the defendants’ promise to pay. The plaintiff recovered, and the defendants appeal.

The instrument sued on reads as follows:

“Wichita, Kansas, October 25, 1917. “The following note is given to cover balance of payment on 112,000 shares of stock in the Wichita Independent Consolidated Companies at fifteen cents per share, and is to be paid as the stock is resold by Buser & Carney.
“On demand we promise to pay L. S. Naftzger, his heirs or assigns, fifteen…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burke v. DulaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Bartholomew v. FellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  3. Greenstreet v. CheatumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. TruskettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Underwood v. VilesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  2. Macksville State Bank v. EhrlichSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  3. Hangen v. PinkstonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  4. Schlotthauer v. GreenfieldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  5. Graber v. Star Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API