Legal Opinion

Schlotthauer v. Greenfield

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 11, 1922No. 23,557PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Marion district court; Roswell L. King, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The action was one to cancel an oil and gas lease. Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff, and the defendant appeals.

The lease was dated July 2, 1919, recited a consideration of one dollar, and granted the plaintiff’s farm to the defendant for the sole purpose of operating for and producing oil and gas for the. term of five years, and as much longer as mineral was produced. The lease contained the following provision:

“If no well be commenced on said land on or before the 2d day of July, 1920, this lease shall terminate as to both…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rice v. RiceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  2. Bartholomew v. FellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  3. Underwood v. VilesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  4. Miller v. BussSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  5. Naftzger v. BuserSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Continental Supply Co. v. MorganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  2. Hayen v. GreenfieldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API