Hangen v. Pinkston
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Kiowa district court; Littleton M. Day, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
West, J.:
This action was brought upon a promissory note payable to the order of J. H. Taylor, signed 0. H. Pinkston, and indorsed J. H. Taylor, per C. A. T. Plaintiff alleged that he was the holder and owner in due course.
The answer, after a general denial, alleged that the plaintiff was not the owner and holder of the note, but that he was the agent and tool of C. A. Taylor and W. S. Taylor, and a bank employee in a bank where they transacted business. It admitted the execution of the note', but alleged that it was procured in the following manner:
“Tha…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Crump v. LanhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Stevens v. InchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
- Underwood v. VilesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
- Union National Bank v. PirotteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
- Naftzger v. BuserSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bushnell v. ElkinsWyoming Supreme Court · 1926
- Hudson State Bank v. HaileSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
- Macksville State Bank v. EhrlichSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925