Legal Opinion

Blackerby v. Monarch Equipment

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 1, 1953PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOREMEN, Justice.

Appellants, W. F. Blackerby and Tillie M. Blackerby, are married. Appellant, Margaret Molloy Blackerby, is their daughter. On May 7, 1943, they conveyed to her property which is known in the record as 229 McDowell Road. By judgment of the circuit court this transfer was held to be without consideration and, therefore, void insofar as it attempted to defeat a lien obtained by the appellee, Monarch Equipment, a corporation, as the result of the levy on July 17, 1937, of an execution upon this same property. Appellants are dissatisfied with the judgment.

Before appellants’…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Young v. FitchCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  2. Ewald Iron Co. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1910
  3. Kentucky Title Company v. HailCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  4. Castle's Admr. v. Acrogen Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  5. Holliday v. Cornett, SheriffCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Strong v. First Nationwide Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1998
  2. Leonard v. Farmers & Traders Bank ShelbyvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1980
  3. Rudd v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API