Legal Opinion

Holliday v. Cornett, Sheriff

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided May 1, 1928PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge McCandless

Affirming.

The principal issues in this case were either joined or tendered in the former action of Tennis Coal Company et al. v. McCager Holliday, Martha Holliday, and Tolbert Holliday, in the Perry circuit court. In that action the- Kentucky Coal Corporation and the Elkhorn Coal Corporation, as the only stockholders of the Tennis Coal Company, joined it as parties plaintiff; and the plaintiff Tennis Coal Company recovered a. judgment" against the other parties above named, quieting its title to the land describeddn the action.

An appeal was taken from…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Young v. FitchCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  2. Johnson v. CarrollCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  3. Villier v. Watson's AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  4. Ratliff v. ChildersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  5. Hopkins v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Flint Cold Storage v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Pioneer Coal, Company v. AsherCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  3. Holliday v. Tennis Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  4. Martin v. Pack's Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2011
  5. Wells-Elkhorn Coal Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API