Legal Opinion

Meyers v. German Fire Insurance

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1917No. 19634PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Valley county: James N. Paul, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtCornish, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment in suit on a fire insurance policy.

It appears that, without the knowledge or consent of defendant, plaintiff violated the, forfeiture provision against additional insurance. In the absence of waiver, this rendered the policy void or voidable at the instance of the insurance company. Hughes v. Insurance Co. of North America, 40 Neb. 626; Home Fire Ins. Co. v. Wood, 50 Neb. 381; Slobodisky v. Phœnix Ins. Co., 52 Neb. 395; Nebraska Mercantile Mutual Ins. Co. v. Sasek, 64 Neb. 17.

*856It is argued that if the facts of the case do not bring it within the reason and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Home Fire Insurance v. KuhlmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Hughes v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. German Ins. v. HeidukNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Home Fire Insurance v. WoodNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Slobodisky v. Phenix Insurance Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Beazell v. Farmers Mutual InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Cox v. Home Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  3. Quisenberry v. National Fire InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Kent v. Insurance Company of North AmericaNebraska Supreme Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API