Home Fire Insurance v. Wood
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Ferguson, J.
1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.
This was a suit to reform a policy of fire insurance, and for judgment on the policy when so corrected and reformed. The court found for plaintiffs, reforming the policy and entering judgment for the full amount of insurance, with interest and costs. The only assignment urged for a reversal is the one which challenges the suf*382ficiency of the evidence to sustain the finding and judgment.
The facts may be briefly summarized thus': Wright Bros., on and for some time prior to June 27, 1891, were, and had been, engaged in the mercantile business at Pairfield, and B. P. Hyde was the soliciting agent…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Howland v. BlakeSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- National Fire Insurance v. CraneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1860
- Hughes v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- German Ins. v. HeidukNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
- Eagle Fire Co. v. Globe Loan & Trust Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1895
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- George H. Fitchner & Co. v. Fidelity Mutual Fire Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
- Grand View Building Ass'n v. Northern Assurance Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1905
- Slobodisky v. Phenix Insurance Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Neary v. General American Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
- Paine-Fishburn Granite Co. v. ReynoldsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1927
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.