Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Insurance Co. of North America

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1894No. 5633PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Error from the district court of Holt county. Tried below before Bartow, J. See opinion for authorities upon the questions discussed.

1Opinion of the Court

Ragan, C.

Patrick S. Hughes sued the Insurance Company of North America in the district court on a policy of fire insurance to recover the value of a building destroyed by fire owned by said Hughes and insured by said insurance company. At the close of the testimony the district court *628directed a verdict for the defendant, upon which judgment was rendered, and Hughes brings the case here on error.

The policy sued upon contained this provision: “That the having of other insurance thereon [the property], or any part thereof, valid or invalid, prior or subsequent,' not made known to this company…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hubbard & Spencer v. Hartford Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  2. Continental Insurance v. CoxIllinois Supreme Court · 1879
  3. German Ins. v. HeidukNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Thomas v. Builders' Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  5. Barnard v. National Fire InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Oates v. Continental Insurance Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Home Fire Insurance v. KuhlmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Bank v. . Ins. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  4. Eagle Fire Co. v. Globe Loan & Trust Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Home Fire Insurance v. Hammang Bros. & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1895

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API