Legal Opinion

Seeds v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided October 7, 1940No. 44279PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhitaker, Judge

I

The contract between the plaintiffs and the defendant for the building of alterations to the Emsworth Dam on the Ohio Biver required plaintiffs to use the old dam as the downstream arm of the cofferdam already constructed and those to be constructed by the plaintiffs. Plaintiffs insist that the defendant thereby impliedly warranted that this dam was sufficient for this use, but that it was discovered that the old dam had holes at the bottom of it which made it impossible to use it for this purpose. When this condition was discovered, the defendant, after consultation with the plaintiffs,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rust Engineering Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1938
  2. Karno-Smith Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1936
  3. Thompson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1940

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Nrm Corporation v. Hercules IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
  2. Brock & Blevins Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  3. Brock & Blevins Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  4. Spirit Leveling Contractors v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  5. Cannon Construction Company, Inc., Ed. J. Kearns, Company, Incorporated v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API