Radey v. McCurdy
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 303, Jan, T., 1903, by defendants, from decree of C. P. No. 1, Phila. Co., June T., 1903, No. 3495, on bill in equity in case of John Henry Radey v. James McCurdy and Samuel McCurdy, trading as McCurdy Brothers. Bill in equity for an injunction. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court. Error assigned was the decree ordering the defendants to pay the plaintiff the sum of $5,400 and costs.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Brown,
This was a bill by a landlord to restrain his tenants from removing trade fixtures from the demised premises. A preliminary injunction was awarded, but subsequently dissolved. Before final hearing all the articles were removed by the tenants, and the court’s decree was that they pay their landlord $5,400, the value of the articles removed, together with the costs of suit.
On September 17, 1892, the appellee leased the premises described in the bill to John C. McCurdy and James McCurdy, trading as McCurdy Brothers, for the term of ten years from October 1,1892. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kerr v. KingsburyMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Hill v. SewaldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1867
- White v. ArndtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1836
- Watts v. LehmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
- Davis v. MossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1861
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Blake-McFall Co. v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Anderson-Tully Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
- Sassen v. HaegleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Springs v. . Refining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Ray v. YoungSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.