Legal Opinion

State v. Edmonson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1999No. 1998-2603PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 86 Ohio St.3d 324.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. EDMONSON, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Edmonson,

1999-Ohio-110.] Criminal law—Penalties and sentencing—R.C. 2929.14(B), construed and applied. R.C. 2929.14(B) does not require that the trial court give its reasons for its finding that the seriousness of the offender’s conduct will be demeaned or that the public will not be adequately protected from future crimes before it can lawfully impose more than the minimum authorized sentence. (No. 98-2603—Submitted June 9, 1999—Decided…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. EdmonsonOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Whitelock v. Gilbane Building Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. State v. Brewster, Unpublished Decision (6-11-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. State v. MontgomeryOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. State v. CondonOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. State v. CowanOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. State v. MatthewsOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API