Legal Opinion
State v. Montgomery
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 11, 2005No. C-040190PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hildebrandt, Judge.
{¶ 1} Following the entry of a guilty plea, defendant-appellant Antonio Montgomery was convicted of trafficking in cocaine, a fifth-degree felony, in violation of R.C. 2925.03(A)(1). The trial court imposed an 11-month prison term and ordered that it be served consecutively to the prison term in the case numbered B-0301478. (At the time of his conviction for trafficking in cocaine, Montgomery had been on community control in the case numbered B-0301478. Based on his new trafficking conviction, the trial court found that Montgomery had violated his community-control…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. EdmonsonOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. ComerOhio Supreme Court · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- In re Ohio Criminal Sentencing Statutes CasesOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Thompson v. Warden, Belmont Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- State v. LoweryOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
- State v. RobertsOhio Supreme Court · 2008
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.