Legal Opinion
Wagner v. Salvation Army
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided November 17, 1986No. CIV-2-86-223PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HULL, Chief Judge.
This is an action brought pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act. 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. Plaintiff claims that he worked in excess of forty hours per week for defendant Salvation Army in Kingsport, Tennessee, but has never been paid overtime compensation. Defendant contends, on the other hand, that plaintiff is not entitled to overtime compensation because he was not employed by an enterprise engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce within the meaning of the Fair Labor Standards Act (the Act). Defendant moves for summary judgment.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Tony and Susan Alamo Foundation v. Secretary of LaborSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Mrs. Billie B. McCLURE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the SALVATION ARMY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- National Labor Relations Board v. The Salvation Army of Massachusetts Dorchester Day Care CenterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Peter J. Brennan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Harrison County, MississippiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Donovan v. Tony & Susan Alamo FoundationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
3Cited by11 opinions
- Archie v. Grand Central Partnership, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Benton v. Laborers' Joint Training FundDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Reagor v. Okmulgee County Family Resource Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Kitchings v. Florida United Methodist Children's Home, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2005
- Joles v. Johnson County Youth Service Bureau, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.