Waldron v. British Petroleum Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
HERLANDS, District Judge:
PART 1 *
The issues raised by defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff's antitrust action and for summary judgment 1 have such far-ranging implications that an extensive recital of the facts is unavoidably necessary.
' Factual Background.
The controversy at bar originates out ,of the, dispute between Great Britain and Iran over the nationalization of Iranian oil. In March and April of 195Í, the Iranian Parliament, under the leadership of Dr. Mossadegh, enacted legislation which nationalized the oil industry ar;d thereby abrogated a concession held by the Anglo-Iranian Oil…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Woods Exploration & Producing Company, Inc. v. Aluminum Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Indium Corporation of America v. Semi-Alloys, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Turner v. American Bar Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1975
- Parks v. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.