Legal Opinion
Crucible, Inc. v. Stora Kopparbergs Bergslags AB
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 19, 1984No. Civ. A. 74-917, 74-1062PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIAMOND, District Judge.
In these consolidated suits, plaintiff Crucible, Inc. (hereafter “plaintiff” or “Crucible”) seeks to enforce claim 30 of U.S. Patent No. 3,746,518 (hereafter sometimes “the Holtz patent”) and claim 4 of U.S. Patent No. 3,561,934 (hereafter sometimes “the Steven patent”) against a group of corporately related defendants, Stora Kopparberg Corporation, Uddeholm Steel Corporation, Stora Kopparbergs Bergslags AB and Uddeholms AB (hereafter collectively referred to as “defendants” or “Stora/Uddeholm” or “Stora”). Crucible seeks an injunction against sales of…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Sanitary Refrigerator Co. v. WintersSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Westinghouse v. Boyden Power Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kloster Speedsteel AB v. Crucible Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Kloster Speedsteel Ab v. Crucible Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Fisher-Price, Inc. v. Safety 1st, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2003
- Crucible, Inc. v. Stora Kopparbergs Bergslags ABDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1988