Legal Opinion
Fisher-Price, Inc. v. Safety 1st, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided August 28, 2003No. Civ.A. 01-51PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SLEET, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On January 26, 2001, Fisher-Price, Inc. (“Fisher-Price”) filed suit against Safety 1st, Inc. (“Safety 1st”), Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc., and Dorel Design and Development, LLC (collectively “Safety 1st” or “the defendants”), alleging infringement of several patents. The patents-in-suit, United States Patent Nos. 5,660,435 (the ’435 patent), 5,947,552 (the ’552 patent), 6,257,-659 (the ’659 patent), 6,247,755 (the ’755 patent), and 431,940 (the ’940 patent), relate generally to infant carriers, strollers, and bassinets.
Safety 1st asserted…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Reebok International Ltd. v. J. Baker, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Smith International, Inc., a California Corporation v. Hughes Tool Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- High Tech Medical Instrumentation, Inc. v. New Image Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Standard Havens Products, Inc. v. Gencor Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Ksm Fastening Systems, Inc. v. H.A. Jones Company, Inc. And Erico Jones CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Robert Bosch LLC v. Pylon Manufacturing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Honeywell International, Inc. v. Universal Avionics Systems Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2005
- Presidio Components Inc. v. American Technical Ceramics Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 2010
- Martek Biosciences Corp. v. Nutrinova Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2007
- RMH Tech LLC v. PMC Indus., Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.