Legal Opinion

Domestic Sewing Machine Co. v. Jackson

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1885PublishedCited by 46 opinions

FROM KNOX. Appeal from the Chancery Court at Knoxville. M. L. Hall, J., presiding by interchange.

1Opinion of the CourtLuabejuck, C. J.

This case was brought to this court from the chancery court at Knoxville, by appeals of S. T. Atkin, J. W. and R,. E. Gaut.

The bill was filed in December, 1880, to hold At-kin and J. W. Gaut liable as sureties for certain notes, aggregating some $700 or $800, upon which complainant had obtained judgment against defendant,. Jackson, as principal and sole obligor.

The bill alleges that prior to October 31, 1876, complainant had been selling .defendant, Jackson, on credit, “sewing machines and appurtenances,” and on that day said Jackson and said Atkin and J. W. Gaut executed a bond, which is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Howe Machine Company v. . FarringtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1880

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Siddarth Shah and Daksha Shah, Plaintiffs-Appellants/cross-Appellees v. Racetrac Petroleum Co., Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  2. MacOn County Livestock Market, Inc. v. Kentucky State Bank, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1986
  3. R.A. Peck, Inc. v. Liberty Federal Savings BankNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Huntington National Bank v. HookerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1991
  5. Dozier v. Hawthorne Development Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1953

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API