Legal Opinion
State v. Ventola
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 7, 1937PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAvery, J.
The accused was brought to trial upon an information charging him with offering to pay to Carmine Riolino the sum of $200 with intent to influence his testimony and conduct in a certain civil proceeding then pending. Upon his arraignment, he elected to be tried to the court and filed a motion to quash and a demurrer to the information. These motions having been overruled, the trial was had, and the accused found guilty and sentenced accordingly. The information was filed under General Statutes, § 6168, appended in the footnote. In his appeal, the accused assigns error in the action of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- In Re DurantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907
- State v. PeckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
- State ex rel. Carleton v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1905
- Grievance Committee of the Hartford County Bar v. BroderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Weber v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983
- Hyllen-Davey v. Plan & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- United States v. SmithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
- Second Injury Fund v. LupachinoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- In Re City of BridgeportUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.