Legal Opinion

State v. Conklin

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 14, 1911PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Washington District Court. — Hon. K. E. "Willoockson, Judge:. The defendants were convicted of receiving and concealing stolen property, and appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Si-ierwin, O. J.

The defendants were originally tried *217in justice court on an information charging that they had knowingly received and aided in concealing certain stolen property, consisting of onions, cabbage, potatoes, and other articles therein specified; said property having been stolen by one Enos Dean. They were convicted before the justice, and appealed to the district court, where they demurred to the information, on the ground that it charged more than one offense, that it failed to set out the names of the owners of the property, and was bad for duplicity. The demurrer was overruled,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  2. State v. KimesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  3. State v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
  4. State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
  5. Harrison v. CharltonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MathesonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
  2. State v. NeifertSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  3. State v. SchlenkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  4. United States v. Le FantiDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1919
  5. Garcia v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API