United States v. Le Fanti
District Court, D. New Jersey
Dominick Le Fanti was convicted of receiving stolen goods, part of an interstate shipment of express, knowing the same to have been stolen. On rule to .show cause why verdict of guilty should not be set aside and new trial granted.
1Opinion of the Court
HAIGHT, District Judge.
The defendant, Dominick Le Fanti, was indicted jointly with Joseph A. Reaves and Frank McManus, for having in their possession a bale of silk which had theretofore been stolen from a platform or depot of the American Railways Express Company, at Jersey City, in this district, and which was a part of an interstate shipment of express, knowing the same to have been stolen, in violation of Act Feb. 13, 1913, c. 50, 37 Stat. I,. 670 (Comp. St. §§ 8603, 8604). Le Fanti (hereinafter referred to as the defendant) was tried alone and convicted. While I have never entertained…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LeonardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
- Kaufman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Tobin v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
- Commonwealth v. KronickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- In re Franklin on Habeas CorpusMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Rumely v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- Bartlett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
- United States v. Lawrence Thomas and Michael Angelo BalducciCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Jerry Robert Loman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957
- George E. Shibley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.