State v. Fitzgerald
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Mahaska District Court. The defendant was indicted, tried and convicted for the crime of seduction, and he appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Rothrook, Ch. J.
1. Criminal Law: seduction: indictment held sufficient. I. The indictment charges that the defendant “did seduce and debauch one Nellie Eerree, then aQd there being an unmarried woman of previous chaste character; that said seduction and dehauching of said Nelle Eerree was then and there accomplished by said defendant by means of false artifices, promises and arts; that said defendant then and there promised to give said Nellie Eerree presents if she would allow him to have sexual intercourse with her; that said defendant told said Nellie Eerree that there would be no harm in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Marler v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
- State v. CollinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
- Harrison v. CharltonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
- Kean v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1873
3Cited by21 opinions
- Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
- Robertson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- State v. KimesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- State v. PoeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.