Legal Opinion

Crosby v. Baizley

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 16, 1994PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLLINS, Active Retired Justice.

Donald S. and Beverly Baizley appeal from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Sagadahoc County, Marsano, J.) holding that Brendan J. and Anne Marie Crosby acquired a strip of land by acquiescence and that Baizley was liable in trespass. Baizley argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a judgment as a matter of law. He argues that there was insufficient evidence to allow the jury to find acquiescence. Crosby cross-appeals and argues that the trial court erred in instructing on adverse possession. We vacate the judgment.

This appeal…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Preble v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1893
  2. Calthorpe v. AbrahamsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  3. Emerson v. Maine Rural Missions Ass'nSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
  4. Tallwood Land & Development Co. v. BotkaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
  5. Marja Corp. v. AllainSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Glidden v. BeldenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  2. Striefel v. Charles-Keyt-Leaman PartnershipSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  3. Dowley v. MorencySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  4. Dombkowski v. FerlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
  5. Lee v. KonradAlaska Supreme Court · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API