Legal Opinion
Mize v. Hall
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided July 2, 2008No. 07-10659PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:
Mark Mize, a death-sentenced prisoner in Georgia, appeals the district court’s denial of his federal habeas petition. The district court concluded that Mize’s prose-cutorial misconduct claim was procedurally defaulted; that the Georgia Supreme Court’s resolution of his Brady claim was neither contrary to nor an unreasonable application of Supreme Court precedent; and that Mize has not made out a claim of actual innocence. For the reasons detailed below, we affirm.
I. Facts
On direct appeal, the Georgia Supreme Court summarized the facts of Mize’s case as follows:
Viewed…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Ward v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- Cunningham v. District Attorney's Office for Escambia CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- Mason v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- Smith v. Secretary, Dept. of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- Owen v. Secretary for the Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.