United States v. Rose
United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FRANCIS, Senior Judge:
Consistent with the appellant’s pleas, a military judge sitting as a general court-martial convicted him of multiple offenses, including: one specification each of attempted larceny, violation of a lawful order, drunk driving, forgery, house breaking, and obstructing justice, in violation of Articles 80, 92, 111, 123, 130, and 134, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 880, 892, 911, 923, 930, 934; 11 specifications of larceny, in violation of Article 121, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 921;1 and three specifications of indecent assault, also in violation of Article 134, UCMJ.2 The…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- United States v. PolkUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. RoseCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2012
- United States v. RambharoseUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020