Legal Opinion

Calhoun v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 22, 1981No. Civ. 62215PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WOODS, J.

The sole issue presented herein is whether the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board properly apportioned part of the petitioner’s overall hypertension and cardiac disability to nonindustrial causes.

I

Petitioner, Rufus V. Calhoun, (hereinafter applicant) sustained an injury resulting in hypertension and cardiac disability arising out of and occurring in the course of his employment as a heavy equipment opera tor for respondent, City of Los Angeles, during the period April 1, 1961 through October 29, 1971. There is no dispute that the applicant sustained industrial cumulative…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Zemke v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Lundberg v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Berry v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Franklin v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Pullman Kellogg v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. GillardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  2. King v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Ditler v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. Tucker v. Pony Exp. Courier Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API