King v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JOHNSON, J.
We review a decision of respondent Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Board) that 70 percent of applicant’s cardiovascular and psychiatric disability should be apportioned to preexisting disability. Because we conclude the employer failed to meet its burden of proving applicant had preexisting cardiovascular and psychiatric disability, we will annul the Board’s order denying reconsideration.
Factual and Procedural Background
Applicant claimed she sustained cumulative industrial orthopedic, psychiatric, and cardiovascular injury during the December 3, 1983, through December…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hegglin v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Lundberg v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Berry v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Franklin v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- U.S. Auto Stores v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. GillardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Ashley v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Keulen v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Tyler v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Fresno Unified School District v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.