Legal Opinion

Riley v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided January 10, 1969PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAREY, Justice:

The appellant, John M. Riley, was convicted, after a non-jury trial, of violating Title 11, § 669(a) Del.C.1953, which prohibits keeping or using paraphernalia for non-licensed betting operations. He charges error in three rulings made by the trial Judge in Superior Court: (1) denial of appellant’s motion to exclude testimony concerning certain telephone calls received while the police were in the apartment and heard by one of the officers; (2) denial of appellant’s motion to compel the State to reveal the identity of an informer whose information constituted part of the basis…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Sabbath v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Scher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Lee v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Billeci v. United States. Lewis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. Fred "Freddy Campo" Campagnuolo, John "Jackie Campo" Campagnuolo, and Michael "Mike Douglas" GougulesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  2. United States v. Samuel John PassarellaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  3. Commonwealth v. TodiscoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  4. Renzi v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1974
  5. State v. FlowersSuperior Court of Delaware · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API