Riley v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
CAREY, Justice:
The appellant, John M. Riley, was convicted, after a non-jury trial, of violating Title 11, § 669(a) Del.C.1953, which prohibits keeping or using paraphernalia for non-licensed betting operations. He charges error in three rulings made by the trial Judge in Superior Court: (1) denial of appellant’s motion to exclude testimony concerning certain telephone calls received while the police were in the apartment and heard by one of the officers; (2) denial of appellant’s motion to compel the State to reveal the identity of an informer whose information constituted part of the basis…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Sabbath v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Scher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Lee v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Billeci v. United States. Lewis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. Fred "Freddy Campo" Campagnuolo, John "Jackie Campo" Campagnuolo, and Michael "Mike Douglas" GougulesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Samuel John PassarellaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Commonwealth v. TodiscoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Renzi v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1974
- State v. FlowersSuperior Court of Delaware · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.