Legal Opinion

Renzi v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided May 1, 1974PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERRMANN, Chief Justice:

The defendant seeks review of his conviction for possession of a narcotic drug with intent to sell (16 Del.C. § 4725), asserting, inter alia, that the Trial Court committed reversible error in permitting the State to present evidence of an alleged prior sale in the effort to prove intent to sell. The defendant further contends that if such evidence is excluded, there is insufficient evidence to support a conviction on the charge of intent to sell.

I

In endeavoring to prove that the defendant had the intent to sell narcotic drugs, the State introduced, over the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. State v. HughesArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Holden v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1973
  4. Edwin Arnold Kraft v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
  5. Redden v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Getz v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
  2. Diaz v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1986
  3. Dawson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
  4. DeJesus v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  5. State v. WinterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API