Legal Opinion

Lee v. Florida

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 17, 1968No. 174PublishedCited by 189 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stewart

The three petitioners were convicted in a Florida trial court for violating the state lottery laws. Their con-*379victims were affirmed by a Florida district court of appeal,1 and the Supreme Court of Florida denied further review. We granted certiorari to consider the application of § 605 of the Federal Communications Act of 1934, 48 Stat. 1103, 47 U. S. C. § 605, to the circumstances of this case.2 That statute provides:

“[N]o person not being authorized by the sender shall intercept any communication and divulge . . . the existence, contents, substance, purport, effect, or meaning of such…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by189 opinions

  1. Desist v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. PeltierSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Tyrone Gaither v. United States of America, Charles Tatum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  4. Danforth v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. State v. SantiagoHawaii Supreme Court · 1971

184 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API