Lee v. Florida
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stewart
The three petitioners were convicted in a Florida trial court for violating the state lottery laws. Their con-*379victims were affirmed by a Florida district court of appeal,1 and the Supreme Court of Florida denied further review. We granted certiorari to consider the application of § 605 of the Federal Communications Act of 1934, 48 Stat. 1103, 47 U. S. C. § 605, to the circumstances of this case.2 That statute provides:
“[N]o person not being authorized by the sender shall intercept any communication and divulge . . . the existence, contents, substance, purport, effect, or meaning of such…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by189 opinions
- Desist v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. PeltierSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Tyrone Gaither v. United States of America, Charles Tatum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Danforth v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- State v. SantiagoHawaii Supreme Court · 1971
184 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.