State v. Flowers
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
QUILLEN, Judge:
The case at bar presents the difficult question of the accused’s right to, and the prosecution’s privilege against, disclosure of the identity of an informer. See Annot. 76 A.L.R.2d 262.
In this case, the State presented evidence which showed that' an unnamed informer introduced a police officer to the defendant and the defendant sold the police officer heroin. The defense was alibi. Disclosure of the identity of the informer was not required at trial. Defendant was convicted by a jury. 1 Defendant has, among other things, moved for a new trial because of the Court’s ruling on…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. Eugene Lamar Jackson, United States of America v. RuthjacksonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Sierra v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
- Renzi v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1974
- Wheatley v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983
- Sullins v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2007
- Butcher v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.