Legal Opinion
British Steel Plc v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided April 2, 1996No. Slip Op. 96-60. Court Nos. 93-09-00550-CVD, 93-09-00558-CVD, and 93-09-00567-CVD thru 93-09-00570-CVDPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CARMAN, Judge:
The following actions were consolidated by order of the Court of International Trade dated February 4, 1994: British Steel pic v. United States, Court No. 93-09-00550-CVD and Geneva Steel, et al. v. United States, Court No. 93-09-00572-CVD consolidated as British Steel pic v. United States, Consol.Court No. 93-09-00550-CVD; Usinas Siderurgicas de Minas Gerais, S.A. v. United States, Court No. 93-09-00558-CVD, Gulf States Steel, Inc. of Alabama, et al. v. United States, Court No. 93-09-00574-CVD, and Usinas Siderurgicas de Minas Gerais, S.A. v. United States, Court No.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Rust v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Harry F. Chaveriat, Jr. v. Williams Pipe Line CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- British Steel PLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- LTV Steel Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
- British Steel Plc v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
- British Steel Plc v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
- Saarstahl Ag v. United States, Defendant/cross-Appellant, and Inland Steel Bar Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.