Legal Opinion
British Steel Plc v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided August 13, 1996No. Slip Op. 96-130. Court Nos. 93-09-00550, 93-09-00558, and 93-09-00567 thru 93-09-00570-CVDPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CARMAN, Judge:
In British Steel PLC v. United States, 924 F.Supp. 139 (CIT1996) (British Steel II), appeals docketed, Nos. 96-1401-06, (Fed.Cir. June 21, 1996), this Court stayed its consideration of the Department of Commerce’s (“Department” or “Commerce”) first privatization remand, Final Results of Redetermi-nation Pursuant to Court Remand on General Issue of Privatization (dated July 17, 1995) (Privatization Remand), as it pertained to Certain Steel Products From Germany, 58 Fed.Reg. 37,315 (Dep’t Comm. 1993) (final determ.) (German Final Determination), and of all issues related to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. The United States and Zenith Radio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- American Lamb Company v. The United States, and New Zealand Meat Products Board, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Seaboard Lumber Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- LTV Steel Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
- Saarstahl Ag v. United States, Defendant/cross-Appellant, and Inland Steel Bar Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- LTV Steel Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Inland Steel Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
- Saarstahl Ag v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.