Legal Opinion

Bank One, N.A. v. Borse

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 8, 2004No. 2-03-0361PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hutchinson

Following a bench trial, the trial court entered judgment in favor of plaintiff, Bank One, N.A. (Bank One), on defendant Susan Clontz’s counterclaim alleging breach of fiduciary duty. In her counterclaim, Clontz alleged that Bank One breached its fiduciary duty as the trustee of the Anton G. Borse Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust (the trust). Clontz alleged that Bank One failed to properly manage the assets of the trust and failed to deal fairly with all of the trust’s beneficiaries. On appeal, Clontz contends that (1) the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to extend the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Martin v. Heinold Commodities, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Kinzer v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Capitol Indemnity Corp. v. Stewart Smith Intermediaries, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  4. Maguire v. City of MacombIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  5. In Re Estate of O'DonnellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Catania v. LOCAL 4250/5050Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  2. Prodromos v. Everen Securities, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  3. Estates of McKnight v. Bank of America, N.A.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  4. Bublitz v. Wilkins Buick, Mazda, Suzuki, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  5. Bublitz v. Wilkins BuickAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API