Legal Opinion

Kinzer v. City of Chicago

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1989No. 67169PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Moran

Plaintiff, Phyllis Kinzer, filed her verified fourth amended complaint in the circuit court of Cook County pursuant to section 1 — 5—1 of the Illinois Municipal Code (Code) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 24, par. 1 — 5—1) seeking to obtain declaratory relief, injunctive relief and to recover damages on behalf of and for the benefit of the City of Chicago against defendants, the City of Chicago (City) and Daniel Grim (Grim) et al. The circuit court granted Grim’s cross-motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment against both Grim and the City. Plaintiff appealed.

On…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Catlett v. NovakIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  3. People Ex Rel. Scott v. BricelandIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Mora v. StateIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  5. City of Chicago Ex Rel. Cohen v. KeaneIllinois Supreme Court · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Gross v. Town of Cicero, Ill.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  2. Rein v. David A. Noyes & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
  3. People Ex Rel. Burris v. Progressive Land Developers, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Havoco of America, Ltd., a Delaware Corporation, Cross-Appellee v. Sumitomo Corporation of America, and Elmer C. Hill, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  5. Armstrong v. GuiglerIllinois Supreme Court · 1996

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API