Legal Opinion

Morrison v. Swank

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 21, 1971No. 44956PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HODGES, Justice.

Petitioner filed his application asking this Court to assume original jurisdiction for the purpose of issuing mandamus to The State Industrial Court requiring it to conduct a hearing on the merits of his workmen’s compensation claim. The Industrial Court en banc by order is holding in abeyance petitioner’s claim pending the outcome of an appeal from the Workmen’s Compensation Director of the State of Kansas to the Supreme Court of Kansas denying jurisdiction. Order vacated and mandamus issued.

Petitioner was hired by respondent in Oklahoma and in his claim filed before the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Agee v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  2. Chapman v. John St. John Drilling CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Schenkel v. Tower Builders Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Secrest Pipe Coating Co. v. StricklandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  5. State Ex Rel. First Nat. Bank v. OgdenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Scruggs v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  2. Morrison v. Hurst Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  3. Morrison v. Hurst Drilling CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  4. Maxwell v. Faith Transport, LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API