Legal Opinion

Chapman v. John St. John Drilling Company

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1963No. 7315PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NOBLE, Justice.

The question for decision is whether successive workmen’s compensation awards can be made in different states, deducting the amount of the first award from the second.

Claimant, a resident of Texas, was employed in Texas to work on an oil well drilling rig in New Mexico and suffered an accidental injury in New Mexico arising out of and in the course of his employment. He filed a claim for the injury in Texas and was awarded compensation of $30.00 per week for not to exceed 26 weeks for temporary total disability by the Texas Industrial Accident Board. Two hundred eighty dollars…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Alaska Packers Assn. v. Industrial Accident Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Milwaukee County v. M. E. White Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Baltimore & Phila. Steamboat Co. v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Genuine Parts Co. v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Nowell v. NowellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  3. State v. MadalenaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Webb v. Arizona Public Service Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Burns v. Transcon LinesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API