Legal Opinion
Morrison v. Hurst Drilling Company
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 13, 1973No. 45731PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMMS, Justice:
The sole issue presented involves correctness of an order denying petitioner’s claim for compensation, on grounds the claim was barred by limitations under 85 O.S.1971, § 43, more than one year having elapsed after last rendition of authorized medical services.
This Court previously has considered related issues arising from this cause. See, Morrison v. Swank, et al., Okl., 489 P.2d 1328. By reason of the conclusion reached, we avoid discussion of evidentiary matters other than those disclosing the present problems.
*644Petitioner was hired in Oklahoma, and August 2, 1967, assumed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Swafford v. SchoebSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Secrest Pipe Coating Co. v. StricklandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- Loffland Brothers Co. of Venezuela v. HammanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Morrison v. SwankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
3Cited by4 opinions
- Morrison v. Hurst Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1973
- Burns v. Transcon LinesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
- Burns v. Transcon LinesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
- Maxwell v. Faith Transport, LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015